Winter 2012

Has a school or district in your area reduced asthma triggers and improved indoor air quality?

The California Department of Public Health’s asthma program, California Breathing, is now accepting nominations for fourth annual Achievements in Respiratory (AIR) Health Awards.  Nominations are due March 30, 2012.

To be eligible for the award, schools and districts must institute air quality improvement efforts and demonstrate that they have reduced or eliminated exposure to asthma triggers at school, including toxic cleaning supplies, pesticides, furry animals in the classroom, and other triggers.  Additionally, winners must address maintenance problems affecting indoor air quality and enforce state regulations reducing bus idling near schools, and smoking bans on school property.

AIR Health Award recipients will receive:
  • $5000 (school districts)
  • $1000 to $2000 (schools)
  • A trophy
  • A commendation letter
  • Publicity for their school/district’s efforts

Visit California Breathing to learn more about the awards and to download an application
.
Be sure to view the video about our 2011 winners!

Winners will be announced on April 24th, National Healthy Schools Day!
 

An Indoor Environmental Management Plan

Getting school people to do it.

Most school officials we’ve met have had good things to say about Tools for Schools.  After saying the good things they then go on to tell us that they’d like the time, staff and money to do all the good things that have ever been suggested to them.  Then they add that they’d like to have the time, staff and money to do the things they’re actually required to do – but since they don’t – they can’t.

All this was true many years ago when we started the Tools for Schools outreach and, naively, we thought that by now, there would be a greater understanding of what it takes to educate kids, including what it takes to maintain schools in a way that would promote health and make the schools more conducive to learning.  Sadly, that has not happened and in many ways, including public attitude and especially in school financing, it has gotten much worse.  How then can we expect beleaguered school officials, maintenance staff and teachers to embrace another program?

The good news is that schools have always been run by, maintained by and occupied by unusually dedicated people who truly want to do the right thing by our (and often their own) children.  Consequently we are not throwing up our hands in despair, we’re honing our skills and getting better at what we do.

What are we up against?
I suspect we’ve all heard of a version of the following: “We’ve been asked to do so much for so long with so little that they now expect us to do the impossible with nothing!”  This essentially is what we hear from school folk.  You can’t continually vote down school funding propositions while increasing expectations on the school system to educate kids (whether their families value education or not) without generating a certain attitude of “I can’t get any appreciation no matter what I do so why bother?” and “If they ask me to do even one more thing, I’ll scream!” 

We also hear school officials say that since they can’t afford repairs they don’t want to raise attention to the problem – the Pandora’s Box story all over again.  “We can do some things but we don’t want to hand the teachers a loaded gun.”  And of course there are those people who just don’t believe that improving air quality in schools could improve test scores. 

Is there ANY good news out there?
The reality is that those same people are there because they care about the kids and they understand the importance of their jobs – so there is hope.  And in many cases these same people find that they’re suffering from poor indoor environmental conditions themselves or their children are.  There are potential champions out there.  We have to find ways to drag them onto the wagon, often kicking and screaming as we do so.  In a way, it’s a little like the stories of people trapped on top of their houses during a flood and need to be convinced that they should allow us to rescue them.

So … what to do?
As your kids have homework, so do you.  It’s often difficult to influence people when you don’t know much about them.  And the last thing they want to hear is, “Hi!  I’m here to tell you how to do your job!” Nope – that surely will NOT work.  So … class … your assignment is on the board.  It’s due before school lets out for the summer. 

Assignment
•    Learn about your school and district.  Who’s who?  What do they do?  Why do they do it?  What are the major issues? What about their funding?  Who is doing good things?  Who has complaints?  Who suffers from asthma? 
•    Is the maintenance staff responding to complaints about comfort or other indoor environmental conditions?  To what do they attribute the complaints – real issues or “it’s all in their heads.”  Do they respond to problems that may be caused by school occupants?
•    What goes on in the school?  Who has the couches, the air fresheners, the pets, the science experiments?  Do the teachers have control over their ventilation systems?  Do they know anything about ventilation?  What does the school smell like and feel like?
•    Are the students enthusiastic (any of them?)?  Is there an environmental club?  Is there a teacher advisor?
•    Learn how to and when it’s appropriate to make comments or provide information at school board meetings or faculty meetings.
•    Write letters to the local paper praising the good work the school or district does and explain their resource needs.  Do the same at city council meetings.

A school district is in many ways like a small or not so small country.  It’s a democracy with elected representatives and it takes an informed and vocal citizenry to get things done.  In this case the things you need to get done will affect the health of all of our children and will have repercussions throughout their educational career.  So start working on that assignment.  The school year has a way of flying by.

The EPA has provided a list of online resources to help school personnel and community volunteers learn more about and address indoor air quality issues.
 

Third Hand Smoke

Have you ever noticed the smell of cigarettes lingering in a crowded elevator? Or perhaps the faint odor of smoke leftover in a hotel room? If you have, third hand smoke is to blame, and recent research has shown it can be harmful, especially to children and people with health issues like asthma.

The dangers of firsthand and secondhand tobacco smoke, which contain thousands of chemical toxins, are well known by most individuals. Third hand smoke however, is made up of the lingering residue that can persist for months after a cigarette is put out. It can linger in smokers’ hair and clothing, not to mention cushions, carpeting, and even walls.

Recent research has shown that third hand smoke reacts with ozone, creating ultrafine particles that can make their way deep into a person's lungs and could present a bigger threat to asthma sufferers than nicotine itself.  Additional substances in third-hand smoke include hydrogen cyanide, used in chemical weapons; butane, which is used in lighter fluid; toluene, found in paint thinners; arsenic; lead; and carbon monoxide.

To address the problem of drifting tobacco smoke, many apartment buildings have voluntarily chosen to make their buildings smoke-free. Not only are smoke-free policies popular among residents, recent research by Dr. Michael Ong from UCLA demonstrates that owners of California multi-unit rental buildings could save up to $18 million a year statewide on the cost of cleaning apartments vacated by tenants who smoke.

Unfortunately, despite efforts to clean up apartments after tenants who smoke move out, nicotine will persist in a house previously occupied by smokers even if the rooms are given fresh layers of paint, new carpeting and standard cleaning, according to a recent study led by Georg Matt of San Diego State University. Additionally, although voluntary smoke-free policies can prevent the health hazards and added costs of secondhand smoke, such policies can be quickly overturned when the landlord or property management company changes hands. As such, more and more cities have passed local ordinances aimed at restricting the damage that secondhand and third hand smoke cause for the residents of multiunit housing. 

According to the American Lung Association, as of October 2011, twenty-two local jurisdictions in California have passed smoke free multiunit housing ordinances. Furthermore, in September of this year, California lawmakers passed a law allowing landlords to ban smoking on their properties. While it has always been legal for landlords to do so, this law is intended to raise awareness of the issues and increase the number of smoke-free options for tenants.

Ultimately, smoke-free multiunit housing ordinances aim to protect those most at risk of exposure to second and third hand smoke, especially children, the elderly, and people with heart or lung conditions like asthma. Secondhand smoke results in about 4,000 deaths each year from heart disease and lung cancer, and it is the cause of approximately 31,000 childhood asthma episodes and 4,700 pre-term infant deliveries annually, the UCLA researchers said.

Given what we know about the harm caused by second and third hand smoke, it is essential to protect people where they spend most of their time – in the home. Some advocates believe such policies discriminate against low income tenants who smoke, but the real discrimination is against low-income families who cannot escape exposure to deadly secondhand smoke and cannot find another place to live because of income, health, or other reasons. Low income individuals have less access to health care and are more likely to suffer from conditions, such as asthma, that are worsened by secondhand smoke exposure.

 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2